Find out more about the editorial board for International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. Yoshihiro Baba. Doshisha University, Japan. Janusz Bialek. Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Moscow, Russian Federation. Audun Botterud. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois, USA. Leon Trotsky was born Lev Davidovich Bronstein on 7 November 1879, the fifth child of a Ukrainian Jewish family, of wealthy farmers in Yanovka or Yanivka, in the.

I'm not exaggerating either; 'Moscow: Power of Submission' needs to be seen to be believed. This production is so impressive that there is even a documentary about the making of it. Filmed on location in Russia, and featuring some of the most beautiful performers you can imagine, the story follows a group of Russian soldiers as they go about their day. There is something very raw and realistic about this movie. Maybe it's the exotic setting and impressive sets, and the beautiful and authentic Russian uniforms. Download Anime Megaman Starforce Sub Indo on this page. Maybe it's because there is more than sex going on. The production values are so good that when there is not a sex scene happening, this actually looks like a real, mainstream movie.

It isn't easy to make men having sexual relations with other men, look so completely 'straight,' but it is achieved here, making this a real fantasy. Because the men don't look like models, but rather real military guys. My personal favorite scene shows them hanging around outside in the freezing cold, sharing a bottle of vodka before they go inside for a card game that soon turns into a drunken orgy.

Too bad the director, 'The Bear' only directed one film. This guy is listed as the cameraman for Kristen Bjorn, but 'Moscow: Power of Submission' is better than anything Bjorn ever made.

This paper analyzes the coercive and legitimate forms of power in Ukraine. It describes the crisis of legitimacy in Ukraine as a contradiction between a blatantly cruel system of capitalism dominated by a few oligarchs, and the lingering remnants of a Soviet mentality. Two strategies are used by the Government to stoke the crisis. First, increased identification with ethnic or regional groups are instrumentally used by the Government to take attention from economic and class issues. Second, the incorporation of a Soviet meaning of power into the new national identity and presentation of it as core norms, believes, and values of the people of Ukraine competes with alternative Ukrainian identity concepts. The paper analyzes five main features of the Soviet meanings of power – political, social, and economic paternalism, perception of power as source of profit and violence, and the dual reality of power with the gap between official narratives of power and a real life. The process of incorporation of the Soviet concept of power into national identity is facilitated by the process of national identity formation that helped to preserve the Soviet perception of power, because of the absence of a new ideology, a lack of critical assessment of the Soviet past, an absence of the vision of outcome, an embryonic culture of democracy, and contributions of all the presidents to the preservation of the Soviet meaning of power.

People justify the system as legitimate and fair for many reasons: out of historic habit and deemed moral obligations, self-interests and/or a fear of sanctions, identification with the ruler, zones of indifference, an absence of will and self-confidence, desire to support a strong leader based on ambiguity intolerance, hierarchy – enhancing ideologies, and a general tolerance of injustice. The obedience of subjects is connected with the strength of will of the subjects and the social structures of the society. In Ukraine, the society is not united, not organized, has no identity of “us”, no civic accountability, nor even any real interest in such matters. Civil society levels are very low, as reflected by limited opportunities for civic responsibility and participation and few demands from the society. • Previous article in issue • Next article in issue. Korostelina is an Associate Professor and a Director of Program on History, Memory and Conflict at the School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University.

She is a publishing extensively on identity-based conflicts, ethnic and religious conflicts, interfaith dialog, history education and conflict resolution. She has been Fulbright New Century Scholar, a Regional Scholar at the Kennan Institute, and a Fellow at the Open Society University. Her research and peacebuilding practices were supported by the grants from the MacArthur Foundation, Soros Foundation, the United State Institute of Peace, US National Academy of Education, Spenser Foundation, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs of USDS, USAID, INTAS, IREX, and Council of Europe. Among her books are: Why They Die? Civilian Devastation in Violent Conflict (2011); The Social Identity and Conflict (2007); Structure and Dynamics of Social Identity (2003). She is an editor of Forming Culture of Peace (2012), Identity, Morality and Threat (2006) and Interethnic Coexistence in the Crimea: The Ways of Achievement (2002).